top of page
Marble Surface
RA pt2.png

My body paragraphs had weak thesis stattements and it became very repetitive as my only claim consisted of how the author evoked emotions from the audience. All the paragraphs had great pieces of evidence, but the fact that my only intention was to persuade my readers on Matheson's usage of rhetorical devices, I never got to elucidate the message and monster of the novel. 

RA pt1.png
RA pt3.png

 

 

The thesis statement was incomplete and invalid due to pathos being the main focal of my essay. I clearly did not fully understand the prompt for my first draft and continued on addressing the audience's evoked emotions rather than discussing the genre and Matheson's internal message in the novel. 

My overall essay was very weak and clearly did not oblige to the prompt given. The essay was so repetitive and there were never any strong claims nor connections. It did not showcase any scholarly critical thinking or my comprehension of the course. Additionally, my conclusion was boring as it just gave the readers a recap of my ideas. Again, it was repetitive and sounded very unfinished. 

RA pt4.png
RA pt5.png

What Professor Greg has to say....

"There’s some strong writing in the sentences and the essay’s author clearly has a clear, strong voice in her prose. The essay falters by depending essentially on one primary point—that the reader is utterly engaged—and that the reader’s engagement leads to emotional responses that can only really be expressed in various terms of probability. Any connection to genre is more-or-less missing. These issues, coupled with an incomplete understanding of where the essay’s headed, make it difficult to follow the overall argument. Still, there’s some strong writing here and the suggestion that the writer’s strengths aren’t yet being fully deployed. The main thing is to go back to what we’ve been discussing in class and to apply those principles in service to an overall argument that’s strongly foregrounded in the essay’s thesis statement and, then, throughout the essay. Let me know if you have any questions about this." 
final draft pt1.png
final draft pt2.png
final draft pt3.png

The process of revision....

After multiple peer reviews, I realized that my first draft never obliged to the prompt. It was incomplete as I only concentrated on the unknown - how the audience felt. My claims were weak because the rhetorical analysis was supposed to be aimed at the novel and not the impact of pathos. What I should have written about was the internal message of the novel and the usage of the classical horror genre. I never mentioned who the real art-horror monster was in my first draft as well so, when I wrote my final draft I made sure to include Matheson's intended moral and monster. For instance, I included the clear shifting image of the monster being the vampires prior and the revelation of our protagonist being the genuine monster that satisfies the art-horror genre expectations. Essentially, I made sure to go through the prompt's checklist when writing my essay as well as the knowledge I obtained when revising my classmates' essays. 

© 2021 by Kathy Vo. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page